AMERICAN
CINEMA PAPERS PRINT
ARCHIVE 1983
|
BERLIN FILM FESTIVAL – 1983 BRIGHT RED
TOFFEE APPLES by Harlan Kennedy At first sight he may appear a trifle
rough, even vulgar. But you have to remember that he spent more than half a
century in Berlin, where there lives – as many a detail has made me realize –
a species of the human race so bold that little can be gained by treating
them with nicety; on the contrary, you have to grit your teeth and resolve to
be brutal yourself if you don't want to go under. —Goethe, 1827 It was a dark and
wintry night when the Titanic came to West Berlin. This was not the
ghost of the great ocean liner but a giant chunk of live-in sculpture, formed
of a large slab of shiny gray stone pierced at an angle by a glass room. It
was craned down from the skies on the FilmFestspiele's
opening night. Astonished Berliners stood by and dropped
their bright red toffee apples. The arrival of the Titanic, designed
by Peter Sturzebecker and Kenji Tsuchiya to
symbolize the split and encompassed city (a room of light encased in stone)
also marked half a century since Hitler's ascension to power and was,
possibly, the most alarming thing Berliners
had
seen since the erection of The Wall. Behind this
architectural beast (soon to be tamed by becoming a festival information and
news point) lurked the palatial Zoo-Palast Cinema,
where the early phase of the Main Competition was hitting an average of two
icebergs per day. Enough to crack the spirit. Concussed passengers wondered
how the festival ship could possibly survive a movie like West Germany's This
Rigorous Life by Vadím Glowna, a story of displaced
Germans in Texas oppressed by colliding accents (Spanish Angela Molina and Polish Jerzy
Radzilowicz, Wajda's Man
of Iron, play the lead "Teutons") and
Fifties-style color photography. Or Daniel Schmid's
high-camp Hecate from Switzerland,
where Lauren Hutton and Bernard Giraudeau cavort through the North African casbahs. Here
Miss H. surely becomes the first leading lady of cinema to be ravished on a
balcony in full evening dress – and in very challenging ¾ time, to
the accompaniment of an oompah waltz. The festival rallied,
and steamed on toward a fair final week. Balmy zephyrs arrived with four
feisty movies by Margarethe Von Trotta, Eric Rohmer, Alain
Tanner,
and Alain Robbe-Grillet. Von Trotta's was best. Heller Wahn (Labor of Love) is a smoldering tale
of sibling loyalties like her previous film, The German Sisters. This
time, though, the two heroines, mentally disturbed Ruth (Angela Winkler) and
ice-cool Olga (Hanna Schygulla), aren't
sisters, they're the wives of mutual friends. When they strike up an
intimate, symbiotic friendship, despite the jealous cries of their males, Von Trotta seems to be bugling a reveille for a new
Germany, reknit by feminist strength and wisdom and
the banishment of patriarchy. Labor of Love is also kookily
electrifying on its own level of character-chemistry. Winkler, whose
brother's suicide has tipped her into mourning madness, is a
lightning-struck, black-garbed Antigone; her
goldfish mouth is ever agape to communicate the incommunicable. Schygulla is
a tender, musk-cheeked nymph in primrose yellow, with a streak of pure
viciousness. The sweet and savage sides of a Platonic romance are strongly
folded together, and the movie climaxes with one of the most memorable
gunshots since Spellbound. How the mighty are
time-warped! Robbe-Grillet is still fixated on Marienbadesque surrealism. Tall men in
tuxedos; sex and shadow-play in Palladian mansions; glances exchanged like
moves in a game of Nim. There is nothing more
formalist than some forms of irrationality. And yet La Belle Captive, photographed
by visionary French veteran Henri Alekan, was
the best-looking film in Berlin. Its plot – hero seeks beautiful
girl, casually met the day before at a disco, who turns out to have been dead
for six years – is the trigger to a Cocteau-like game of mystic erotic
consequences, using Magritte's paintings as iconic text and a dazzling
knock-on of non-sequitur as rhythmic base. In The White City takes Swiss director Alain Tanner
to Portugal, where he is hit by a dose of minimalism even stronger than the
one that got Wim Wenders
in
The State of Things. Ship's engineer Bruno
Ganz stops
off at Lisbon to have a mid-life crisis. This consists of large hours of
walking the streets or gazing out of his hotel window. Meantime, he has an
affair with the young hotel maid, writes letters and sends an 8-mm film diary
to his wife in Germany, and is mugged and non-fatally stabbed by street
hoodlums. Sounds like my vacation. Tanner says he made
the film up as he went along. But no rude remarks, please, because this is
one movie where spontaneous evolution does work – oddly, crankily, and
eventually. A clock that runs backward, white sheets dancing in the wind,
and Ganz's dazzlingly extemporized performance,
built on doodles and tiny tics of behavior, tell the story of a man trying to
create a clean-slate freedom by a constant, time-defying rhythm of wiping
away the past and starting again. In Pauline a la Plage Eric Rohmer says,
"Take your partners, please" for another of the French helmer's sprung-rhythm sexual comedies. This one is set
in beach-resort Normandy among a permutating
sextet of three men, three women. There's something unnerving about Rohmer's
productivity-rate. Like rabbits from a bottomless top hat, these toujours charmants tales keep being plucked. But this one is as
wise and funny as the best, and no moviemaker in the world has Rohmer's knack
for finding the tiny air-gap, like a man drowning in an icy river between
farce and tragedy, and breathing deeply, luxuriously in. ● A brace of movies in
the Competition deserve to be hymned for their visual qualities. Xavier Schwarzenberger, the Austrian
cinematographer of several Fassbinder films, directed his
first feature, The Still Ocean, and it joined Robbe-Grillet's
film and Erden Kiral's A Season In Hakkari from Turkey as one of the three
handsomest movies on show. Hanno Pôschl plays a young country
doctor coping with personal guilt (for past negligence that killed a patient)
and a rural rabies epidemic. Meanwhile a pastoral storm of fabulous lighting
effects – lucent mists and foliate shadows and swags of chiaroscuro
– turns the film into an Eighties realm of true German Expressionism. The Turkish film is
differently eye-catching. Blocks of daylight-scorched Kurdish primitivism
build the tale of an itinerant teacher spending winter in a snow-clad
mountain village. Slow story but hewn and hieratic images. Kiral won the Silver Bear Special Jury Prize for the
film. ● The Golden Bear was
again surgically bisected. Mario Camus's underwhelming La Colmena (The Beehive), a kind of Iceman
Cometh set in post-Civil War Spain, shared the top prize with Edward
Bennett's Ascendancy from Britain.
Bennett casts Julie Covington (the original Evita
who
played Sister Sarah in the National Theatre revival of Guys and Dolls) as
a rich girl in 1920 Belfast; she wears the trauma of her brother's death in
World War I in a paralyzed right arm and is slowly awakening to the new war
on her very own doorstep, between the British and the Irish. (1920 was the
year in which British rule came to Northern Ireland.) The movie is decent
and austerely serious, and Covington wears her black weeds attractively in a
role that's really a one-woman funeral procession. But Bennett's direction
doesn't make the pulse race, and he tends to simplify the Irish problem into
a mere Emerald Isle extension of that old British warhorse, class
conflict. ● All in all, the 1983
official movies were some compensation for the fact that year after year fest-chief Moritz de Hadeln
(and, before him, Wolf Donner and Alfred Bauer) has
been caned red and raw for the poor quality of the Main Competition. This
year, as if blessed by Herr Micawber, something kept
turning up. And even on the days when something didn't, there were always
the eventful Berlin sideshows – The Young Film-Makers Forum, The New
German Cinema section, The Retrospective, The Information-Show – to
which one dashed off for a hot and hasty bite. These filmgoing
equivalents of the Imbiss kiosks on the
sidewalks yielded up hot dogs and currywurst to
gelid or expiring passers-by. Ulrich and
Erika Gregor run the Forum with firmness, vigor, and a
brave attempt at air-conditioning, in a large, tomb-like air-raid shelter
called the Delphi Filmpalast. This
"alternative" event boasts huge and faithful audiences of the bedenimed young. If the kids can't find seats at a packed
screening, they don't stand demurely against the wall as in the Zoo-Palast; they encamp on the tobacco-ashed
floors or hang from the bomb-damaged caryatids on the ceiling. Many of the Forum
movies are either hard-line political agitprops
or
hard-core structuralist conundrums. The latter
come with titles like (I'm improvising) Windows No. 17A or Replay
Gestalt with Negative-exposed Taxis. They are good to sample as aesthetic
flavor-clearers – cheese or sherbet – between courses. Some are even tangy
and revelatory in their own right. Michael Snow's So Is This_______ plasters white-lettered words of
varying sizes on a black screen and, like Godard
in
his heyday, shows the astonishing kinetic, sensual impact of words and
letters. But even the Forum
stands or falls by its feature films, and this year it tottered. Best
discovery was Tankred Dorst's
Eisenhans. This plugs into the German
Wozzeck tradition of boor-as-hero,
with Gerhard Olschewski playing a lumbering
beer-truck driver of low I.Q. whose devotion to his semi-autistic daughter (Susanne Lothar) is more than paternal. He remains undismayed even as Buchner-like tragedy falls out of the heavens,
threatening to bash him on the cranium. What galvanizes this
monochrome movie of love's lumbers loosed is Dorst's
use of an all-through symbolism of rift and rupture. The East-West German
border setting acts as tuning fork to all the barbed emotional
"frontiers" of the story – the girl's adolescence, the father's
brute dithering before the no-go area of sex – and there are leitmotiven throughout that give imagistic density to the film.
Cracking, grass-pierced tiles in a tavern kitchen are rhymed with quaked and
fissured cobbles in a street. Turkeys and chickens squawk and clamor as
farmyard ids. Best of all, Dorst unironically bestows angelic
qualities on the girl (visual puns on haloes and angel's wings) but ends by
making her passivity the strongest force of evil in the movie. "Slumberer, awake," the movie seems to say-perhaps as
much to Germany as to its heroine. ● Those who didn't want
to wake could hibernate in the Retrospective. For an event that has previously
fielded lustrous tributes to Lillian Harvey, Marlene
Dietrich, 3-D
und su weiter, this
year's Retro was a disappointing rag-bag. "Exile: Six
Actors from Germany" spoke the title, and the intent was no doubt to mark
the 50th anniversary of Hitler's election-to-power by outlining six careers
that might have been totally different had Herr
H.
not goose-stepped into history. Whether they would have been any more
distinguished is open to question. The medium-to-low-magnitude
careers of Francis Lederer, Curt Bois, Dolly
Haas, Hertha Thiele, Wolfgang Ziher
(aka Paul Andor),
and
Elisabeth Bergner duly unspooled. But outside Deutschland, Bergner was the only "star" of the sextet. And
even her elfin face, cracked-honey voice, and poor-little-rich-vamp persona
wear thin when she's called on by director-husband Paul Czinner
to carry movie after movie set in the same key of S for Schmaltz. Stolen
Life is a fair 1939 predecessor of the Bette
Davis classic, but Dreaming Lips is a gooey-eyed
embarrassment entwining Bergner with "international violinist"
Raymond Massey. Today's Dream Factory,
English-speaking division, came to Berlin with Tootsie and That
Championship Season. The first was a special treat opening the festival and
wowing Berliners with Dustin Hoffman's beaky transsexual
allure. The second won Best Actor Silver Bear for Bruce Dern. Also
on display, honoring Joseph L. Mankiewicz's
presence on the festival jury, was a special screening of Alles Uber Eva – missed by me,
alas, which means I'll never be able to honorably emblazon my T-shirt with
the German slang version of "Fasten your seat belts, it's going to be a
bumpy night." ● In Berlin's market and
Information Show – ever-expanding catch-all programs where the
sublime rubs sprocket-holes with the certifiable – large slices from
the underside of American cinema were served up in Berlin, hot and steaming.
Liquid Sky and Vortex attracted massive audiences which
equally massively dwindled as the movies progressed. The law of diminishing
Punk returns – how do you keep your viewers interested when you shoot
all your taboo-shattering bolts in the first reels? – sent many away
with a new respect for minimalist Tanners and slow-as-she-goes Turkish pics. Three of the best
fringe-of-festival oddities were no-narrative meditations, using cinema's
sleight-of-hand to warp us into different worlds, where time stops or speeds
or slows, and traditional notions of "structure" are dissolved. Echtzeit (Realtime),
by
Helmuth Costard and Jurgen Ebert,
purports to have a thread of story, but on first viewing few could be
expected to seize it, or even find it. The film is a danse macabre of trick photography
set in a mysterious space station, where human beings have been reduced to ghostly
"programs" of their past selves and vision is atomized into lucent
beads and dots like a moving mosaic. It's a pointillist Wonderland, where the
mansions are the human mind and the medium is the message. Sans Soleil brings
back to us France's Chris Marker, once a
nouvelle vague name to juggle with. This globe-hopping documentary
is a kind of Levi-Strauss-as-Supertourist: rhyming
different townscapes and cultures (Japan, Africa, France) in a visual
collage, while also pinpointing and celebrating their inalienable
differences. The commentary is polymorphous-pretentious and springs from the
letters of Sandor Krasna:
"He
said he had been round the world three times and that now only banality
interested him." But the images, freewheeling from emus to umbrellas
to computers, have a crazy-quilt poetry worthy of Robbe-Grillet. Erik de Kuyper's Casta Diva, from the Netherlands,
is an aria to the human body, male. In consecutive, unhurried, fixed-camera sequences,
a man washes himself at a sink; another man fixes a strip-light in a
bathroom; another cuts his hair; another repairs a car; another cleans a
large mirror. The soundtrack is now mute, now quietly talkative, now
exploding outward with an operatic aria or an Italian pop song. It's
free-association serendipity, locomotion, and gesture as a ballet without
rules. For 107 minutes it's oddly hypnotic. ● On the last two days
of the festival, two contrasting and much talked-about political movies
juggernauted into West Berlin: Emile de Antonio's In The
King of Prussia and Andrzej Wajda's Danton. De Antonio shot his
dramatized mock-up of the 1981 Ploughshares 8 trial – starring the
defendants as themselves and based on a digest of the actual court transcript
– in a tiny two days squeezed between the group's trial and imprisonment.
The eight religious anti-nuke crusaders who stormed the General Electric
building in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, taking hammers to nuclear-missile
nose-cones, here pop up in wobbliest video to argue their pacifist defences before Judge Martin Sheen. Given de Antonio's
Marxist sympathies, you'd think it would be an open-and-shut case. And it
is. The General Electric spokesmen are played (by actors) for maximum
hot-under-the-white-collar pomposity, and Sheen as the Judge is so busily
biased and near-dementedly short-fused that it's impossible to see how a
mistrial wasn't called after half an hour. One suspects, in short, that de
Antonio's "digest," even if it contains nothing but the truth, is
so far short of the whole truth as to shade into an area all its own of
fiction-by-imbalance. ▓ Do "Zoo-Palast" wtargnął Danton Andrzeja
Wajdy i zademonstrował widzom berlińskiego festiwalu idealne połączenie sztuki filmowej i polityki. Jak
na film, który był włóczony po ostrych krytycznych
kamieniach przez dwa tak różne
konie jak Francuska Partia Komunistyczna i branżowa hollywoodzka
"Variety", jego zalety
okazały się prawdziwą niespodzianką.
Film jest arcydziełem dramatycznego
kina historycznego i każdy, kto ma oczy do patrzenia, powinien zadać sobie trud, by je szeroko otworzyć.
(...) "Jesteśmy ostatnią
szansą wolności"
mówi Danton. Film Wajdy przekonuje nas, jak strasznie
krucha jest wolność.
Kto wątpi, niech podejdzie pod mur berliński ▓ But the next night Andrzej Wajda's Danton bounded
into the Zoo-Palast and demonstrated the perfect
fusion of film-making and politics. For a movie that has been dragged over
rude critical cobblestones of late, by such diverse horses as the French Communist
Party and Variety, its qualities were quite a surprise. The movie is
a masterpiece of historical-drama cinema, and those that have eyes to see
should take the trouble to open them. The Communists no
doubt passed up Danton's rich complexity of theme
and image because it didn't spew out a fortune-cookie message at the end and
because Wajda, since Man of Iron, isn't
all that popular with Poland's current government. Variety disliked
the movie, more bewilderingly, because it was "stiff" and
"literary." Did they stumble into the wrong cinema and see Gandhi
by mistake? Wajda and
screenwriter Jean-Claude Carriere (Buñuel's ex-collaborator) don't skim the surface,
Attenborough-style, with a series of limpid Sunday School tableaux clinched
by takeaway maxims. They scoop straight to the bottom of the pan to find the
richest, darkest gravy, where political ideas and human passions blend. In Danton, as
in all Wajda's best work, the people are their
ideas and passions. Gerard Depardieu's Danton is
a force of Nature, hands waving and lank locks streaming down a demon-worked
face as he argues himself literally hoarse in the people's tribunal where he
was arraigned in 1793 as a counter-revolutionary. Woijech
Posniak's Robespierre
is
a force of Nurture – chalk-white
moon-face strangled by high collars and a thin-lipped voice ever prophesying doomy Utopias. Robespierre
is
the passion of repression and auto-pilot idealism,
even
more terrifying, like a penned hurricane, than Danton's
freely detonated fury. Even Robespierre is
given his slice of the human tragedy by Wajda.
In
the last scene, after Danton's guillotining he lies
a-drench with sweat under a bedsheet while his young son,
prompted by his mother, proudly recites by heart the rubrics of the
revolutionary constitution. But for a moment it looks as if Robespierre, eyes
popping with silent pain, is succumbing to death by lethal irony. Great moviemakers are
sometimes without honor even outside their own countries. Wajda was
clearly fired to come to France to film the Danton-Robespierre
conflict for its kinship with political polarities in present-day Poland:
"counter-revolutionary" Lech
Walesa versus
the unyielding "revolutionary" rigidity of the Party. Once in
power, Wajda argues, a revolutionary movement often
becomes as autocratic as the tyranny it ousts. It congeals in its own dogmas;
it is a prey to the barbarities it preached against; most alarmingly and
irreversibly, it enthrones itself above the very laws it instituted with its first
breaths of freedom. No doubt Danton's ambivalences are too complex for
modern European Communists, who want a message that spreads straight from the
Moscow freezer. And Wajda hasn't even made the stylistic
concession to them of shooting the film like an agitprop
documentary
– in that hand-held, smallpox-grained, shake-em-up
style that's always considered the imprimatur of revolutionary cinema. Wajda says
that he took the neo-classical paintings of David as his model for both
color (rich blues and grays) and lighting (from stylized shafts like Roman
columns to the theatric flicker of candles). And the clash between formalist
surface and seething, impassioned interior gives the film the very
energy-through-conflict that is absent in most caméra militant movies, where style and Message redundantly
and often concussingly duplicate each other. Furthermore, Wajda's movie is about the struggle between
formalism and freedom: the body democratic wrestles with the corset autocratic.
When the screen does suddenly explode in a coup d'oeil
– a giddying track-forward into the towering, black-draped guillotine,
the hectic pan-shots that follow Depardieu-Danton
up and down court as he argues his defense – the dramatic dividends
are far higher for the surrounding restraint. There is one scene
whose fiercely funny idiomatic humanity radiates out and helps to heat the
whole movie. Danton, not yet arrested but
suspecting he soon will be, invites Robespierre
to
his house and sets out a lavish banquet to soften him up. But Robespierre remains
unmoved as dish after dish is wafted solicitously under his nose – foie gras, quails, duck – and
gestured impassively away. Finally the host, realizing that that game
is up, sits down and sweeps each dish coolly and purposefully onto the floor
before beginning his next stratagem: talk. "We are the last
chance for freedom," says Danton. And Wajda's movie persuades us of the terrifying fragility
of freedom. For doubters, come to the Berlin Wall and see the Soviet
guillotines. COURTESY T.P. MOVIE NEWS. THIS ARTICLE APPEARED
IN THE JUNE 1983 ISSUE OF FILM
COMMENT. ©HARLAN
KENNEDY. All rights reserved. |
|